Built with SuperDocs

Projects that used SuperDocs to do real work on a real document. Every entry is submitted by the person who built it, and every entry links to something you can open and check.

built with SuperDocs The badge every listed project may display.

Listed

Tracked changes disappear when a document round-trips through markdown

A note on why w:ins, w:del and comment anchors don't survive a conversion through markdown, and a two-line check for whether your own pipeline drops them.

Meets the bar: the page is public, SuperDocs drafted content into a named section while the rest stayed put, and the study behind it is published with its sources linked. The sentence SuperDocs wrote was kept; I moved it to the position I had asked for, which it ignored.

Conflict: Submitted and reviewed by the same person — this is the curator's own project. Held to the same three tests as anything else, and disclosed here because the disclosure is the only thing that keeps a one-entry gallery honest.

Submitted by the project's author Reviewed 2026-08-17 Evidence

This gallery opens with one entry. That is the honest state of it: entries are submitted by their owners and verified against a written bar, and exactly one project has met it so far. Padding the list with builds whose owners never asked to be listed would make the badge mean less, which is the only thing the gallery has to protect.

Not in the gallery

R5This gallery, and the badge it hands out

It is the gallery, so R5 applies whatever else is true of it. Stated precisely rather than flatteringly: SuperDocs was used on this project — the curation rule was revised through the API and exported — but both sentences it drafted were rejected on review and the one that shipped was written by hand. A gallery that lists itself to look busier is the exact failure the bar exists to prevent.

Declined 2026-08-16

Getting listed

The bar is written down, and so are the reasons an entry is declined — see the curation rule, then submit a build. Submissions come from the person who built the project. Nothing is harvested, and nothing is listed that its owner did not offer. A decline is answered in public with a numbered reason, not closed in silence.